|
January
26, 2001
Issue
#31
EXTREME
Q&A
by
Jason Meuller
CHECK
YOUR SEROSTIM, IT COULD BE FAKE!
Unbelievably
enough, a counterfeit version of Serostim made its way onto pharmacy
shelves here in the US. No
one should be surprised that Serostim is being counterfeited, most
of the GH sold to bodybuilders is counterfeit.
However, to my knowledge, this is the first time that a
counterfeit has actually ended up on pharmacy shelves and
unwittingly dispensed by pharmacists as the real item.
The
story broke when longtime Serostim users called the manufacturer,
Serono, to inquire as to why the packaging looked different and to
complain about rashes at the site of injection. So far, the counterfeit Serostim has been found in
California, Ohio, Kentucky, Michigan, Florida, New Jersey, and
Missouri.
It
should be noted that all of the counterfeit Serostim has been found
in the legitimate pipeline. Obviously,
the FDA is more concerned with preventing distribution of this
counterfeit GH to AIDS patients than they are preventing Joe
Bodybuilder from buying counterfeit Serostim on the street. If you’ve recently purchased Serostim, you’ll need to
check your lot numbers against the expiration date.
The fake bears lot MNK612A, which is a real lot number
appearing on legitimate Serostim.
However, the counterfeit will have an expiration of 08/02,
while the genuine article will have an expiration date of 08/01.
The
counterfeit can also be identified through the following means:
-
Real
Serostim has a “cake” of powder at the bottom of the vial
that is about 1/8 of an inch in height.
The fake has white powder spread loosely throughout the
vial
-
The
real diluent vial bears the lot number 99H124; the fake diluent
vial says lot 99h124
-
The
fake Serostim has a dark blue label attached to the end of the
box, in which the expiration date and lot number appear. Real Serostim has no such label, the dark blue box is
actually printed directly onto the carton.
This
story broke January 23, and is still developing.
We’ll keep you posted with further updates.
ON
THE BRIGHTER SIDE OF THE GH HORIZON….
With
the possible exception of IGF-1, no bodybuilding drug has the
mythical status of human growth hormone. Anecdotal reports from GH users have done little to give a
measure of the true effectiveness of GH; if anything, they have only
added fuel to the fire. Some
bodybuilders report gains that seem almost impossible to believe,
while others report gaining little, if anything.
Compounding this problem is that very few bodybuilders ever
actually use GH, and those that do are often times using it in too
small a dose or using a counterfeit.
What’s a guy to do?
I
must confess, dear readers, that even I have never used GH and am
quite tired of all the confusion surrounding this hormone.
I thought it high time to take the bull by the horns and get
some definitive answers to some long-standing questions.
About the only way to do this will be to witness first hand
the effects of GH under controlled conditions, ensuring several
things:
-
The
GH used is real (and in this case, it will be Serostim, and it
is real)
-
The
GH is administered correctly and in a high dose (8 IU’s/day)
-
The
GH will not be used alone, but in conjunction with anabolic
steroids, insulin, and thyroid hormones
-
No
changes in diet or exercise will be allowed during the test
period
-
No
changes in bodybuilding drug use, with the exception of the
addition of GH and insulin, will be allowed during the test
period
-
The
test subject is an advanced bodybuilder with proper knowledge of
nutrition and exercise.
Not
the most scientific study in the world, given that we’re only
going to have one test subject.
However, since we failed to get government funding for this
experiment (Damn bureaucratic red tape!!), we had to drop the other
152,134 salivating bodybuilders that had signed up for our little
test. However, I’m pretty damn excited about the whole thing,
simply because I’m finally going to see firsthand whether of not
the expense of GH justifies its use!
Almost
all of the studies we’ve seen in the scientific literature on GH
have been useless in determining its effectiveness as a bodybuilding
drug. First and
foremost, most of the test subjects are not healthy males, more
often than not they have been patients suffering from a wasting or
severely catabolic condition, such as AIDS, cancer, or burn victims.
Secondly, the dose of GH administered in these studies has
more often than not been too little to accurately judge its
effectiveness. Thirdly,
the patients in almost all of these studies have not followed a diet
or exercise regimen that would be conducive to the gain of lean body
mass. Finally, almost
all of the studies have used GH alone, not in a synergistic
“cocktail” of other hormones that are known to increase the
effectiveness of GH.
So,
in a perfect world, we’d set up a study using the following
protocols. We’d use
healthy males, all of whom were advanced bodybuilders with at least
5 years of serious weight training under their belts.
We’d give them a high enough dose of GH so that if no
results were seen, it’s not going to be due to the fact that the
dose was too minimal to have an effect.
We’d make damn sure all of the test subjects were following
a strict diet and exercise regimen for months prior to the test, and
they would not be able to deviate from this regimen during the test
period. This would
ensure that any gains (or lack of) were not due to a change in diet
or exercise. And
finally, and this will be both the most difficult and controversial
step, we would have them follow a drug regimen until they had
reached a plateau, then add the GH and insulin.
Let’s face it folks, if we’ve learned anything from the
few high dose growth hormone studies that have been conducted using
healthy subjects, it should be pretty obvious that GH is a lousy
hormone for bodybuilding when taken individually.
However, I’m fairly certain that GH can be VERY effective
when combined with other bodybuilding drugs, but therein lies our
problem. How do we
combine GH with the other drugs that are necessary to make it
effective and accurately gauge which percentage of gains are
attributable solely to the addition of GH?
About the only way I could solve this dilemma is by having
the test subject follow a drug protocol until he had reached a
plateau, then add the GH and insulin. Yes, there will be those that will say that any gains seen
will be from the use of insulin alone.
Unfortunately, we don’t have a few million dollars to set
up four different control groups, buy boatloads of GH, and monitor a
few hundred advanced bodybuilders for 6-8 weeks.
Anyone interested in funding such a project can contact me
directly, I’m sure we could ask Dr. Scruggs to head up the study
and I’d certainly love to go to work every day.
Anyway,
what we will provide is a very detailed look at ONE individuals
experience with GH. The
whole project will include weekly physique photos of the test
subject, detailed outlines of the diet, exercise, and drug regimen
that was followed both prior and during the test period, and the
weekly comments of the test subject himself.
We’ll also have the subject hydrostatically weighed both
before and after the test period in order to provide definitive
evidence of the efficacy of GH (or lack thereof).
This
project begins in two weeks, and we’ll begin reporting on our test
patient’s progress approximately 4 weeks after he begins GH
therapy. For those of
you concerned with such matters (all of you, I’m sure), the test
subject lives outside the US, so all of the protocols followed
during our study will be perfectly legal.
The test subject has been a friend of mine for years, and is
someone whom I deeply respect and trust, so I’m confident there
will be no deviation from our set protocols.
I’m like a kid before Christmas with this one folks, I
can’t wait to see what happens.
ON
A SERIOUS NOTE…
Comment:
Thank you for
responding so quickly. Yes I realize that you get thousands of letters
everyday, so I realize that you can’t respond to mine the next
day. Nor am I
(I hope) that self-centered to believe that you should. But
for some reason I
felt that it seemed the more you grew the less you were interested
it us little people. It was the not receiving any message at
all that concerned me. It was through you that I found out
about New Hope Med for instance.
I
am from Maryland and know plenty of doctors, but none have the
cahoonas to give me the things that not only keep me big, but give
the necessary energy to
perform what I need to. Although for me right now the virus is
undetectable, I still suffer from it in reference to being able to do many activities.
I
have found out that exercise of any type, especially weight
training, is like a catch-22. As you are aware, I'm sure, that
resistance training does tax the body,
especially the immune system. But the fact of the matter is
that while resistance
training is muscle producing, my illness is muscle destroying.
So it is a never-ending battle. But I can testify to the
benefits of anabolic steroids. Before
I started using anything my weight was about 145 lbs.
With the few times
that I have been able to get and use roids and consistent training I
have been able to maintain a steady 185lbs. Though the stress
that working out is sometimes
is too much for me, it is well worth it to keep from looking like a
dead person walking. I have tried to persuade doctors here
of the significance that
anabolics can play on the restoration and maintenance of the lean
body mass of people like myself but to no avail. Since we are
talking about my life here, I guess I am forced to do what I
can. I can definitely relate to the people in California
who say that weed helps them with their affliction.
That
is why it is important for me to get as much accurate information as
I can because also my liver is not as healthy as others so I have to
be careful about what is
toxic or not.
I
truly enjoy your no nonsense approach to sharing your information.
I am no rocket scientist
so a lot of medical terminology is difficult for me. So
thank you for keeping it
straight and simple for us morons.
Once again I thank
you for your effort to educate us and for your time and patience.
Answer:
Increasingly, emails addressed to me start with “Did you
get my last email?” or “Why haven’t you responded?”.
I’d like to take a moment to apologize to all of you that
write and fail to get a personal response, the fact of the matter is
that it would not be humanly possible for me to do so.
While I don’t get thousands of emails per day, I do
probably get somewhere in the range of 100-150.
I try to answer as many as time permits, and those that I
find particularly interesting I answer publicly here in the Extreme
Q&A. Remember, AE
is a collection of a talented group of people, scattered all over
the world, who have regular lives outside of their contributions to
the magazine. The only
person working full time on AE is myself, and even I have outside
commitments that require a great deal of my time, including
counseling youthful drugs offenders (yes, that’s not a joke
people) and training a plethora of clients.
Every
once in a great while I get a letter from a reader that I find
extremely validating. Yes,
it’s fun working with bodybuilders and helping them develop their
bodies, and it’s certainly a kick in the ass to apply the
principals outlined in AE into my own program and watch as my body
transforms. However,
the feeling I get when I know we’ve helped improve a person’s
quality of life, whether it be related to treatment of something
like AIDS or simple HRT for the aging male, is simply indescribable.
I’ve
been fortunate enough to have been contacted by several AE readers
who found our publication useful in their fight against AIDS.
I’m sure there are many more of you out there in a similar
situation that have never taken the time to write.
Anabolic steroids can be a valuable weapon in the war against
AIDS, not only in prolonging life, but improving its quality.
For more information of the use of anabolic steroids and
AIDS, I urge you to visit www.medibolics.com.
This website is probably the best resource of information on
the aggressive treatment of AIDS and HIV+ individuals using
exercise, supplementation, and anabolic steroids. Good luck and God bless.
IS
MY CLOMID FAKE?
Question:
How are you? I love the web site and look forward to reading it
every week. I have a quick question, has anyone reported that the
anti-estrogen products that SBC sells to be fakes? I just started a
D-ball cycle and after one week my nips started to burn. I was
taking 25mg of D-ball and 50mg of Clomid a day. Your thoughts would
be deeply appreciated.
Answer:
Two things immediately spring into mind.
One, you’re extremely sensitive to estrogen and the Clomid
alone simply isn’t powerful enough to stop the stimulation of the
receptors in your breast tissue. Two, you’re panicking because your left nipple started to
itch after a week on dianabol and now you’re convinced that
you’re developing a nice set of twins.
Lets’
examine my reasoning and solution to each dilemma.
As we all should know by now, Clomid acts not only to restore
normal testicular function in males, but also acts as an estrogen
receptor antagonist. Since
you’re only using 25 mg of methandrostenolone per day, I’d have
a hard time believing that 50 mg of Clomid isn’t sufficient.
However, we can easily find out by stacking Clomid, an
antiestrogen, with an anti-aromatase. For example, you might stack 250 mg of cytadren a day with 50
mg of Clomid, or .5 mg of arimidex per day stacked with 50 mg of
clomid. If this ends your problem, you are apparently EXTREMELY
sensitive to the effects of estrogen, probably the most sensitive
person I’ve ever encountered.
If this is the case, I’ve got some bad news for you.
Unless you’re willing to spend the money to stay on these
antiestrogen/anti-aromatase stacks every time you even THINK of
using steroids, you’re going to have a healthy set of boobs on
your hands.
Perhaps
you’re simply imagining the whole thing.
Hey, I’m not saying it’s not possible to get gyno from 25
mg of methandrostenolone per day, but I do know that the stuff SBC
sells is legit. And
your description of “burning” has me a bit perplexed, I’ve
never met someone who described the feeling one gets from the
over-stimulation of estrogen receptors as “burning”.
Itching, sensitive, irritating yes, burning no.
Bottom line, try step number one first.
If that solves your problem, I guess it’s going to be a tad
bit more expensive for you to use gear than the next guy. However, if you’re still experiencing the same kind of
sensation, you’ve either got another medical problem that’s got
nothing to do with the use of steroids, or the feelings are
psychosematic. Keep in touch.
HELP
WITH MY CYCLE!
Question:
I wanted to get an expert's opinion on how to set up a good cycle.
I have 4000mg of deca, 2000mg Cypionate, and 900mg of
Primobolan. This
will be my third cycle, I'm 29 y/o, 5'10" 215lbs, approx.18%
bodyfat. This was my
original plan, let me know if it's totally off base.
| Week
1 |
300mg
deca |
300mg
Cypionate |
|
| Week
2 |
300mg
deca |
300mg
Cypionate |
|
| Week
3 |
400mg
deca |
400mg
Cypionate |
|
| Week
4 |
400mg
deca |
400mg
Cypionate |
|
| Week
5 |
400mg
deca |
300mg
Cypionate |
|
| Week
6 |
300mg
deca |
200mg
Cypionate |
200mg
Primobolan |
| Week
7 |
|
100mg
Cypionate |
200mg
Primobolan |
| Week
8 |
|
|
300mg
Primobolan |
| Week
9 |
|
|
200mg
Primobolan |
I
would also like to add Clomid, Nolvadex, HCG and Clenbuterol if you
think they would be a good idea, but I'm not entirely sure how to
incorporate them. I've lost too much of my past gains, and would
like to hold on to as much as possible this time.
Thanks for your time.
Answer:
Unless I’m told otherwise, I automatically assume that any
time I’m contacted by a reader in regards to critiquing their
cycle, the purpose of the cycle is to add as much muscle as possible
given certain parameters. Those
parameters can include the length of the cycle, the availability of
various drugs, concerns with side effects, the experience level of
the user, etc. About 90% of the cycles I’m sent suffer from the
same problem; the dosages used are too low for the user to
experience the kind of gains they are expecting.
Quite
honestly, I don’t know of too many people that are going to make
significant gains off a cycle like this, unless it’s your wife or
girlfriend. I would
imagine that the off-season cycles for most of the competitors in
the Ms. Olympia contest are something along these lines, if not
stronger. For a 215 lb
male on his third cycle, it looks like an exercise in futility to
me.
I
would do two things with this cycle.
One, I’d wait until I could obtain another bottle of
testosterone. Two,
I’d save the Primobolan for the day my wife decided she wanted to
get into shape. Here’s
my reasoning.
I’ve
said if before, and I’ll say it again.
If you’re going to use steroids for bodybuilding purposes,
500 mg a week of testosterone is the absolute minimum you should
consider using. Anyone
reading the last Q&A will remember that I advocated the use of 1
gm a week of testosterone to individual who wanted to use steroids for
the first time! I
understand that 500-1000 mg of testosterone a week may seem like a
whole lot of drug to a lot of people.
I assure you, 500-1000 mg of testosterone a week IS
NOTHING MORE THAN AN EFFECTIVE DOSE OF THE DRUG.
You’re
tapering your dose near the end of the cycle, and hoping to maintain
your gains with the addition of a “mild” steroid like Primobolan.
Don’t. It’s
about high time bodybuilders realized that tapering from an
effective dose to one that is ineffective in order to restart
natural testosterone production is a waste of time.
There is no reason to taper when you have access to drugs
like clomid and HCG. My
philosophy towards cycling is that you should remain on an effective
dose over the entire course of your cycle, switching to shorter
acting steroids as the cycle draws to a conclusion.
If it’s your intention to be completely clean in between
cycles, than the drug array you choose should allow you to do so.
All too often bodybuilders think they’re cleaning out for
3-4 weeks in between cycles, despite the fact that during the last
week of the previous cycle, they were using long-acting drugs like
deca and sustanon.
This
topic certainly bears further discussion, as there’s a lot more
ground I could cover here. Look
for my upcoming article, “Designing the Perfect Cycle”, which
should serve as a primer for those of you new to the game.
Until next time, Meuller out.
Extreme Q&A is a
weekly column that allows me to address the questions and comments
submitted by you, the readers of Anabolic Extreme.
Because I get literally hundreds
of emails per week, I can't guarantee a personal response to each
and every question.
However, I do try to answer as
many as possible and the best of these appear weekly in the Extreme
Q&A.
To send me a question or comment,
please email me at Jason@anabolicextreme.com.
BACK
TO CURRENT ISSUE
|