|
January
12, 2001
Issue
#29
EXTREME
Q&A
by
Jason Meuller
PLEASE
WELCOME OUR LATEST SPONSOR
I’m
sure by now many of you have now seen the Barin Corporation/Rejoov
banner that was recently added to the site.
And I’m sure that many of you are aware of the active
ingredient inside the products manufactured by Barin Corporation,
and the history behind them. However,
for those of you that aren’t, (and I know there are some of you
out there), a quick explanation is in order.
Barin
Corporation currently manufactures two cleaning products, Rejoov and
Somax. The active
ingredient inside both of these products is an amazing chemical
knows as 1,4 butanediol, also known as tetramethylene glycol. 1,4 butanediol is remarkable because not only does it clean
like the dickens, but it also will convert to GHB in the body if
swallowed.
It’s
interesting to note that Rejoov and Somax were once sold as
nutritional supplements using the exact same formulation under which
they are currently sold. Unfortunately
for us, the passing of the Federal GHB legislation made it illegal
to sell 1,4 butanediol as a nutritional supplement, and Barin
Corporation was in a bit of a quandary.
Luckily for them, they knew that 1,4 butanediol not only
converted to GHB in the body, but cleans like nobody’s business
(did I say that already?). So,
the stopped selling it as a nutritional product, stuck new labels on
the bottles, and went into the cleaning biz.
So,
while it may seem a bit weird that we’re running an ad for
cleaning products, we here at AE know what messy people bodybuilders
can be. Always cooking,
always getting oil and blood here and there, you guys know what
I’m talking about. Hey,
did I mention that Rejoov and Somax were once sold as nutritional
supplements? Did I also
mention that the only difference between the nutritional supplement
versions and the cleaning versions are the labels?
Just trying to be thorough here folks, and seeing as how
it’s late and I’m tired, I’m having a hard time remembering
what I typed just a few seconds ago.
Anyway, my advice to you is to stock up on these products
now, because very shortly, 1,4 butanediol will become a listed
chemical like GBL. Oh,
and that’s because it converts to GHB in the body.
So, stock up on these products today and get
to….ahem…cleaning. Stuff
sure does cut through grease.
OH
WHERE, OH WHERE HAS MY LIPOKINETIX GONE?
Question:
I’ve noticed that lipokinetix has been marked as “NOT
AVAILABLE” on both the Syntrax and Anabolic Extreme websites.
What’s going on?
Answer:
This is a result of actions taken by my favorite government
agency, the FDA. Most
of you have probably heard of the 5-year Yale University study that
showed a slight risk in the increase of stroke in young women using
products containing phenylpropanolamine (norephedrine).
Mind you, this is ONE study, and it’s important to note
that 6 billion doses of PPA are consumed in this country every year.
However, in a typical reaction, the FDA urged consumers to
stop taking any products containing PPA.
Why? Let’s
examine the real motives behind the FDA’s actions.
First
of all, you’re never going to read a story about
phenylpropanolamine (PPA) that refers to it as norephedrine.
However, norephedrine is indeed included in this whole fiasco
as it’s one of three isomers of PPA.
Now, we all know that norephedrine is an extremely effective
fat burner. And PPA is
an ingredient in most OTC diet pills on the market.
Realistically, there is no bigger cash cow in either the
pharmaceutical or supplement industry than diet products.
And since the FDA is nothing more than a lackey of the
pharmaceutical industry, it’s no surprise to me that they’re
going after PPA with a vengeance.
The
FDA has always had it out for the supplement industry, which is the
primary reason why DSHEA was passed. Bottom line, pharmaceutical companies pay the bills at the
FDA, though the enormous amounts of money they have to spend getting
a drug through the FDA approval process.
Anytime you’ve got a dietary supplement that is taking
significant amounts of money away from the pharmaceutical industry,
you can almost guarantee that the FDA is going to go after it.
And what’s so hypocritical about the whole situation is
that many supplements which are blasted by the FDA and taken off the
market will later appear as pharmaceuticals, as in the case of GHB.
GHB will be available as a prescription sleep-aid this year,
which is amazing considering that when it was sold as a dietary
supplement, it was supposedly killing people in droves and
responsible for sex crimes against hundreds of women.
I guess when you make something a prescription item, it
suddenly becomes safer in the eyes of the FDA.
Right
now, the FDA has simply issued a consumer warning about PPA, and
sent letters to manufacturers of products containing PPA, asking
that they voluntarily remove it from their products. I assure you, this is just the tip of the iceberg.
It’s the FDA’s intention to ban PPA (which of course
means no norephedrine), and if they are able to do so, they’ll be
going after ephedrine next. If
the FDA has its way, the only legal stimulant you’ll be able to
access without a prescription is a cup of coffee.
Because
of the FDA’s actions, norephedrine is becoming harder to find than
a 13 year-old virgin in Tijuana. And as such, Syntrax has had to make a tough choice.
Given that they are now only able to access a limited supply
of norephedrine, they don’t have enough to continue to manufacture
both apipokinetix and lipokinetix.
And since Syntrax doesn’t want to sell an inferior version
of lipokinetix that doesn’t contain norephedrine, they decided to
temporarily pull it from the market.
Right
now, it’s still possible to get supplies of lipokinetix, since
most distributors stocked up before Syntrax stopped sales of the
product. So if you like
lipokinetix, I’d go out and by some now, because in a month, it
may be a little hard to find. I’ve
talked with Derek Cornelius, owner of Syntrax Innovations, about the
future of the product and he’s not exactly sure what will happen
at the moment. Obviously,
if he’s able to access more norephedrine, he can start
manufacturing lipokinetix again.
However, if his ability to access norephedrine remains the
same, he’ll probably reformulate the product so it’s just as
effective using a substitute ingredient.
Remember, lipokinetix is a damn effective product because it
contains usnic acid, norephedrine, diidothyronine, and yohimbine hcl,
all of which are potent fat burners.
Take one of those away and it simply doesn’t work as well.
Even without norephedrine it would still probably be the most
effective fat burning product on the market, but Syntrax doesn’t
want to skimp on quality.
Now
is the time for us as supplement buying consumers to get off our
collective asses and get involved before we wake up needing a salve
back there. If we
don’t do something, norephedrine will be taken off the market,
with ephedrine to follow. Get
involved and write your local congressman a letter.
Contact the FDA and inform them that you disagree with their
position on PPA. Yes,
one letter won’t do a whole lot.
However, if we all take the time to voice our opinions, we
will be heard!
CLARIFICATION
ON EXTREME EATING FOR MASS
Question:
Hi Jason, I've recently read your article on extreme eating for
mass. You say you should eat 25-30kcals per pound of the bodyweight
you want to reach, right? The problem is that if I eat that much, I
'll gain tons of fat. My last cycle was sus @500mg a week for eight
weeks. I've been eating 4000-4500 kcals a day( 300 gr of protein)
and I went from 174lb to196lb. The problem is that almost half is
fat. How can you explain it? Should I have consumed less calories?
Answer:
First of all, you have to carefully read the article.
One of the sections you refer to reads as follows: “At
the elite level, athletes have been known to consume 25-30 kcal per
lb of bodyweight per day.” Notice
that it says “elite level”.
Realistically, a 174 lb bodybuilder doesn’t qualify for an
elite level classification. You
have to understand that while the Extreme Eating for Mass article is
applicable to any steroid-using bodybuilder, the total level of
caloric intake really depends on both your total lean body mass (LBM)
and level of experience. A
bodybuilder who weighs a lean 260 lbs will definitely need to
consume calories in the 25-30 kcal per lb of bodyweight per day
range in order to make it to 285 lbs.
However, a guy your size is just going to get fat.
There
are a couple of other things you should bear in mind. First of all, if you’re going to use steroids, specifically
testosterone, you might as well use at least a gram per week.
The side effects from a gram per week won’t be
significantly more than those you’d see at 500 mg, but the results
will be. Taking a hefty
dose of testosterone will not only help you build more muscle, but
will also help ensure that those extra calories you’re eating go
to increasing LBM and not gaining more fat.
One of the advantages steroid using bodybuilders have other
their natural counterparts is that steroids have a nutrient
portioning effect, and extra calories are more likely to be used to
build LBM than going directly to that flab on your ass.
I
also would recommend that you consider using T3 during your next
cycle. Since it
controls your metabolic rate, taking exogenous T3 will not only
speed up the rate of protein synthesis in your body, but the rate of
fat loss as well. I
firmly believe that when you significantly increase levels of one
hormone in your body, you have to increase other hormones that work
in synergistic combination. I
can guarantee you that a gram of testosterone a week is a helluva
lot more effective when stacked with 100 mcg of T3 a day.
NFL
PLAYER WANTS TO USE STEROIDS!
Question:
I am a current NFL player who is considering his first cycle of
steroids. I was
considering taking test suspension, and Winstrol-V for four weeks.
I will have a month before I report to off-season workouts in
March. Then random drug testing begins.
Will this stack clear my system in a month?
I heard it will, but I need to be sure.
My jobs on the line. An
advice will be appreciated.
Answer:
People often have the misconception that Winstrol (stanazolol)
is a great drug to use when they’re being steroid tested because
it’s water based. However,
the reality of the situation is that the metabolites of stanazolol
can be detected up to 3 months after using the drug, and it’s
actually a very poor choice for steroid tested athletes.
Until
recently, many NFL players have been successful in blaming their
positive steroid tests on OTC dietary supplements.
About the best thing about adrostenedione is that it’s
allowed a lot of athletes a way to weasel out of a positive drug
test. Unfortunately,
after J.J. Johnson was able to skate on his positive steroid test by
blaming it on creatine of all things, the NFL released a statement
that it would no longer tolerate athletes blaming positive tests on
supplements.
If
I were an NFL player, I’d use a shitload of testosterone in the
off-season, when testing wasn’t an issue.
As testing day grew closer, I’d switch to a short acting
testosterone, like propionate or suspension, about two months out,
and only use 200 mg a week a month out.
I’d also use HCG and clomid to restore natural testosterone
production about two weeks before I had the possibility of being
tested. You can read
the back issues of the Extreme Q&A for exact directions on how
to use HCG and clomid.
During
the season, I’d use an enormous amount of human growth hormone (HGH)
stacked with insulin. Since there is no test for either HGH or insulin, you can use
as much as you’d like and not worry about failing a drug test.
Since you’re an NFL player, I’m sure you can afford to
take 10-12 IU’s a day, which is the amount I’d recommend to
someone in your position. Stacking
this with 30-40 IU’s of insulin per day will yield incredible
gains in both LBM and recovery.
By following this protocol, you’ll be kicking some serious
ass on the field. Be sure and let us know how it goes next season.
HOW
SHOULD I USE ANDRO SPRAY?
Question:
I am planning on using Pat Arnold’s Andro Spray. I would like to
know how many sprays a day should you use, and how many weeks should
you be on and how long of a lay off should you take between cycles
of the product? Also,
how long does it take to clear the body to pass a drug test?
[Editors
note: We went straight to the horses mouth for this one, the
following answer is from Pat himself.]
Answer:
How many sprays you take,
and how long you stay on the product, depends on your goals. I am assuming you want maximum results while still decent
endocrinological function.
Therefore
I would recommend that you take around 10 sprays, twice a day.
Take your sprays preferably after you shower and dry off. Spray over as much of the body as possible to make an even
coat.
People
familiar with steroids know that steroid cycles that last 6-8 weeks
are long enough for full benefits to be seen, but not so long as to
cause undue delays in post cycle HPTA recovery.
I recommend the same philosophy for prohormone products,
including topical sprays.
Due
to the fact that nor prohormone contamination of non – nor
prohormone products can take place too easily, despite the most
stringent quality control standards, I do not recommend drug tested
athletes take any prohormone products whatsoever.
The amount of nordione or nordiol that can give a positive
test might be as little as
1
microgram (one millionth of a gram).
Once again, I can't emphasize this enough, if you are subject
to drug testing then do not take any prohormones period.
Androstenedione
out of china has been shown to contain enough nordione in it to
cause a positive test for nandrolone.
And my company makes androdiol out of androstenedione
purchased from china (there is no other source), so therefore all of
our androdiol might have traces of nor in it no matter what we do.
I
should also mention that I would not be surprised if some injectable
testosterone preparations have enough nortestosterone contamination
to be problematic to tested athletes.
Companies that manufacture both testosterone and
nortestosterone products (Brovel), and that may not be poster boys
for quality control (Brovel), are very suspect in my opinion.
It is way too easy to have cross contamination amongst
batches, even by airborne means, that is sufficient enough to cause
drug testing problems.
Questions
can be submitted to Jason Meuller via his email address, jason@anabolicextreme.com
BACK
TO CURRENT ISSUE
|